Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-04-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0746 HB 50 Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 16, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "733,000" Insert "783,000" Under General Funds: Delete "733,000" Insert "783,000" Page 16, line 29: Under Allocations: Delete "733,000" Insert "783,000" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0747 HB 50 CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Brice, Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 11 was not adopted. Amendment No. 12 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 27, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "38,138,400" Insert "39,007,300" Under General Funds: Delete "25,831,800" Insert "26,700,700" Page 28, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete "8,360,800" Insert "9,229,700" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 12 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0748 HB 50 Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Kapsner was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 12 was not adopted. Amendment No. 13 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 27, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "38,138,400" Insert "38,571,000" Under General Funds: Delete "25,831,800" Insert "26,264,400" Page 28, line 5: Under Allocations: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0749 HB 50 Delete "2,675,200" Insert "3,107,800" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 13 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. Representative Bunde moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Bunde was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 13 was not adopted. Amendment No. 14 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 16, line 14: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,080,800" Insert "15,501,400" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0750 HB 50 Under General Funds: Delete "7,080,500" Insert "7,377,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "8,000,300" Insert "8,124,100" Page 16, following line 22, insert a new line: "Citizens Foster Care Review Panel" Under Allocations: Insert "420,600" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 14 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 14 was not adopted. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0751 HB 50 Amendment No. 15 was offered by Representatives Smalley and Kerttula: Page 35, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,639,000" Insert "8,139,200" Under General Funds: Delete "6,642,500" Insert "7,142,700" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 15 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 15 was not adopted. Amendment No. 16 was offered by Representative Kerttula: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0752 HB 50 Page 35, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "6,946,600" Insert "7,081,600" Under General Funds: Delete "4,201,100" Insert "4,336,100" Page 35, line 31: Under Allocations: Delete "1,088,100" Insert "1,223,100" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 16 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 16 was not adopted. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0753 HB 50 Amendment No. 17 was offered by Representatives Kerttula and Smalley: Page 19, following line 9, insert a new line: "Renters' Equivalency Rebate" Under Appropriation Items: Insert "300,000" Under General Funds: Insert "300,000" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 17 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Davies was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Barnes, Joule, Kookesh, Moses, Ogan 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0754 HB 50 And so, Amendment No. 17 was not adopted. Amendment No. 18 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 16, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "55,302,100" Insert "57,702,100" Under General Funds: Delete "55,302,100" Insert "57,702,100" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 18 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Kerttula Representative Cowdery Representative Davies Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0755 HB 50 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Barnes, Moses, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 18 was not adopted. Amendment No. 19 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 27, line 7: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "396,388,100" Insert "401,388,100" Under General Funds: Delete "109,368,000" Insert "111,368,000" Under Other Funds: Delete "287,020,100" Insert "290,020,100" Page 27, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "393,343,100" Insert "398,343,100" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 19 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0756 HB 50 CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses, Rokeberg And so, Amendment No. 19 was not adopted. Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 17, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,415,500" Insert "4,765,500" Under General Funds: Delete "2,127,700" Insert "2,477,700" Page 17, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete "2,774,700" Insert "3,124,700" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Representative Barnes objected. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0757 HB 50 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Davies, Kemplen, Moses, Rokeberg And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Amendment No. 21 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 17, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,415,500" Insert "4,474,900" Under General Funds: Delete "2,127,700" Insert "2,187,100" Page 17, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete "2,774,700" Insert "2,834,100" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 21 be adopted. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0758 HB 50 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Bunde, Moses, Phillips And so, Amendment No. 21 was not adopted. Amendment No. 22 was not offered. Amendment No. 23 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 19, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,984,300" Insert "126,139,300" Under General Funds: Delete "109,633,200" Insert "109,788,200" Page 20, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete "4,605,000" Insert "4,760,000" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0759 HB 50 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 23 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 23 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 23 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Barnes, Moses And so, Amendment No. 23 was not adopted. Amendment No. 24 was not offered. Amendment No. 25 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: Page 25, line 26: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "11,589,100" Insert "11,664,100" Under Other Funds: Delete "9,780,000" Insert "9,855,000" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0760 HB 50 Page 25, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete "1,648,300" Insert "1,723,300" Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 25 be adopted. Representative Bunde objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Barnes, Brice, Masek, Moses And so, Amendment No. 25 was not adopted. Amendment No. 26 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 19, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,984,300" Insert "126,483,300" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0761 HB 50 Under General Funds: Delete "109,633,200" Insert "110,322,200" Page 19, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete "2,420,600" Insert "2,919,600" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 26 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses, Therriault And so, Amendment No. 26 was not adopted. Amendment No. 27 was offered by Representative Joule: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0762 HB 50 Page 15, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "36,222,200" Insert "36,898,100" Under General Funds: Delete "10,824,700" Insert "10,936,700" Under Other Funds: Delete "25,397,500" Insert "25,961,400" Page 15, following line 18, insert a new line: "Alaska Professional Development Institute" Under Allocations: Insert "675,900" Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 27 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0763 HB 50 Excused: James Absent: Dyson, Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 27 was not adopted. Amendment No. 28 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 19, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,984,300" Insert "126,284,300" Under General Funds: Delete "109,633,200" Insert "109,933,200" Page 19, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete "9,119,100" Insert "9,419,100" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 28 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 28 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 28 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0764 HB 50 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Barnes, Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 28 was not adopted. Amendment No. 29 was not offered. Amendment No. 30 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 21, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "766,216,500" Insert "766,316,500" Under General Funds: Delete "711,812,700" Insert "711,912,700" Page 21, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "400,000" Insert "500,000" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 30 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 30 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0765 HB 50 CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 30 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 30 was not adopted. Amendment No. 31 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 32, line 19: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,112,000" Insert "13,191,300" Under General Funds: Delete "6,922,900" Insert "7,002,200" Page 32, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "1,920,000" Insert "1,999,300" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 31 be adopted. Representative Austerman objected. 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0766 HB 50 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 31 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 31 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 31 was not adopted. Amendment No. 32 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 32, line 19: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,112,000" Insert "13,156,800" Under General Funds: Delete "6,922,900" Insert "6,967,700" Page 32, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete "1,409,100" Insert "1,453,900" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0767 HB 50 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Representative Austerman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 32 was not adopted. Amendment No. 33 was offered by Representatives Kapsner and Joule: Page 35, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,423,300" Insert "8,623,300" Under General Funds: Delete "6,951,700" Insert "7,151,700" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0768 HB 50 Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 33 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 33 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 33 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 33 was not adopted. Amendment No. 34 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 35, line 3: Under General Funds: Delete "4,450,900" Insert "4,550,900" Page 35, line 12: Under Allocations: Delete "2,382,500" Insert "2,482,500" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0769 HB 50 Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 34 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Brice, Moses And so, Amendment No. 34 was not adopted. Amendment No. 35 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,498,000" Insert "7,740,500" Under General Funds: Delete "7,498,000" Insert "7,740,500" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0770 HB 50 Page 37, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "5,523,500" Insert "5,766,000" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 35 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 35 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 35 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 35 was not adopted. Amendment No. 36 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 40, line 30: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "17,361,500" Insert "17,141,500" 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0771 HB 50 Under General Funds: Delete "14,963,900" Insert "14,743,900" Page 41, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete "7,672,800" Insert "7,452,800" Page 41, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "28,462,500" Insert "29,063,500" Under General Funds: Delete "27,435,000" Insert "28,036,000" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 36 be adopted. Representative Williams objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 36 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 36 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0772 HB 50 Absent: Kohring, Moses, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 36 was not adopted. Amendment No. 37 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 37, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "11,184,700" Insert "11,275,300" Under General Funds: Delete "8,294,100" Insert "8,384,700" Page 38, line 7: Under Allocations: Delete "1,920,700" Insert "2,011,300" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 37 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 37 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 37 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0773 HB 50 Excused: James Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 37 was not adopted. Amendment No. 38 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 19, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,984,300" Insert "126,080,400" Under Other Funds: Delete "16,351,100" Insert "16,447,200" Page 19, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete "947,800" Insert "1,043,900" Page 21, lines 5-6: Delete all material. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 38 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 38 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 38 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0774 HB 50 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 38 was not adopted. Amendment No. 39 was offered by Representative Kookesh: Page 18, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "9,783,100" Insert "10,183,100" Under General Funds: Delete "2,198,700" Insert "2,598,700" Page 18, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,583,800" Insert "2,983,800" Representative Kookesh moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 39 be adopted. Representative Morgan objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 39 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 50(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 39 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 1999-04-12 House Journal Page 0775 HB 50 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: James Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 39 was not adopted. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 50(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Berkowitz objected. The Speaker stated that CSHB 50(FIN) will be in third reading on the April 13, 1999, calendar.